Pine Rivers High Range Drink Driving Case Study: 0.264 With a Crash, 12 Months Off the Road and Probation, No Fine (QLD)

Jurisdiction
Queensland
Court
Pine Rivers Magistrates Court
Charges
High range drink driving (0.264) with a single-vehicle crash; two dated prior drink driving offences
Outcome
12 months' disqualification, then the interlock program; 10 months' probation; no fine.
Filmed
March 2022

Summary

A 66-year-old former truck driver crashed at 0.264 after leaving home during an argument, at the end of a year of personal crisis. With treatment, the Traffic Offenders Program, letters and comparative cases put to the court, he received 12 months' disqualification, the interlock program and 10 months' probation, with no fine.

Key takeaways

  • The reading was 0.264, with a single-vehicle crash and no one else hurt.
  • He had two dated prior drink driving offences, about 11 and 30 years earlier.
  • He had stopped drinking and was being treated by a psychologist and a doctor.
  • Letters, an apology and comparative case law were put before the court.
  • Result: 12 months off the road, then the interlock program, and 10 months' probation.

A serious high range charge at Pine Rivers

In this Pine Rivers high range drink driving case study, Boorman Lawyers appeared at Pine Rivers Magistrates Court on what our lawyer, Joshua Boorman, describes as a very, very serious high range drink driving offence. The reading was 0.264, and the offence involved a single-vehicle collision.

Thankfully, the client was the sole occupant of the vehicle, so no one else was involved, and there were no injuries. But our lawyer notes that a reading of more than five times the legal limit, together with a crash, were two obvious aggravating features that had to be dealt with.

His record and background

The client had two previous drink driving offences, although they were quite dated: one about 11 years earlier and the other about 30 years earlier.

He is 66 years old and was a professional truck driver until about 12 months before the offence. Josh explains that his life then began to spiral out of control. He had a medical episode at work and was given a permanent leave of absence, which left him with no income. A couple of months later, his wife had a serious accident when she fell into a sinkhole on a property and shattered her leg, leaving her wheelchair bound for almost 12 months.

Neither of them could work, and they were under financial stress. Our lawyer says both began drinking heavily and regularly, which made the home a toxic environment to live in.

The night of the offence

On the night of the offence, the client and his wife were arguing heavily, and it was getting nasty. To remove himself from the situation, he left the house, got into the car and started driving. About 10 to 15 minutes down the road, he had a single-vehicle accident.

Our lawyer says his motivation to leave the house at that volatile point was probably the right thing to do, but the way he went about it, by getting into the car, was all wrong. It was very dangerous, and he was very lucky not to hit, injure or kill anyone.

What was put to the court in this Pine Rivers high range drink driving case study

Josh was able to outline to the court what had been going on over the previous 12 months, how the client’s life had spiralled out of control and, more importantly, the steps he had taken to address his issues. He had stopped drinking, had been assessed and was receiving treatment from a psychologist and a doctor, and had completed the Traffic Offenders Program.

A letter from his workplace confirmed that the issue had put him off the road and out of work. There were also letters from his wife and an apology letter from the client himself. Boorman Lawyers also tendered comparative case law to assist the court in sentencing.

The outcome

The client was disqualified from driving for 12 months from the day of court, and he will have to do the interlock program after that. No fine was imposed, but he was placed on 10 months’ probation.

Our lawyer says they were surprised to get quite a low disqualification period. He believes the court took some sympathy on the client because of the hardship of the previous 12 months, while also needing to send a message to the community that drink driving will not be tolerated. The client was very relieved, and our lawyer thinks it is very unlikely he will be back before the courts.

What this case shows

A very high reading combined with a crash makes a drink driving charge much more serious. In this case, evidence of the personal crisis behind the offence and the steps taken to address it, together with comparative cases, were part of what was put before the court. Every case is different, and the outcome here does not predict any other result.

Key general information (QLD)

General information only, not legal advice, as at October 2026. Every case turns on its own facts.

  • Drink driving offences: In Queensland, drink driving offences are set out in the Transport Operations (Road Use Management) Act 1995 (Qld).
  • The broad penalty picture: For a first offence at 0.15 or more, TMR lists a minimum disqualification of 6 months, a maximum fine of $6,908 and up to 9 months’ imprisonment (as at October 2026; TMR notes fines rose by 3.5% on 1 July 2026).
  • Alcohol interlocks: According to TMR, the Alcohol Ignition Interlock Program applies to people convicted of “high-risk” drink driving offences.
  • Sentencing and convictions: Alongside the disqualification set under the road transport laws, the general sentencing law in Queensland is the Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 (Qld).
  • The court process: Drink and drug driving charges in Queensland are dealt with in the Magistrates Court.

Further reading and related videos

Boorman Lawyers has more on appearing at Pine Rivers, Queensland drink driving penalties and Queensland alcohol interlock laws. Its Queensland DUI site covers drink driving matters across Queensland.

On this site, see Josh’s explainer on high range drink driving, a Sandgate high range case and a Wynnum high range case, or browse all Queensland and court town videos.

For people who are preparing to plead guilty without a lawyer, DIY DUI’s guide to drink and drug driving charges at Pine Rivers Magistrates Court (Strathpine) covers the local court and plea process. (DIY DUI is a self-help program for people preparing their own guilty plea. It is not legal representation and is not part of Boorman Lawyers.)

Frequently asked questions

What penalty did the court impose?

A 12-month disqualification from the day of court, followed by the interlock program, and 10 months’ probation. No fine was imposed.

What made the offence so serious?

Josh points to the very high reading of 0.264, more than five times the legal limit, and the single-vehicle crash. The client also had two prior drink driving offences, although they were about 11 and 30 years old.

What was handed up to the court?

Evidence of treatment from a psychologist and a doctor, a Traffic Offenders Program certificate, a letter from his workplace, letters from his wife, an apology letter from the client, and comparative case law.

Why does Josh think the disqualification was low?

He believes the court took some sympathy on the client because of the hardship of the previous 12 months, while still sending a message that drink driving will not be tolerated.

What are the penalties for a first high range offence in Queensland?

For a first offence at 0.15 or more, TMR lists a minimum disqualification of 6 months, a maximum fine of $6,908 and up to 9 months’ imprisonment (as at October 2026).

Who has to do the interlock program in Queensland?

According to TMR, people convicted of high-risk drink driving offences, which include driving at 0.10 or more, driving under the influence, failing to provide a specimen, dangerous driving while affected by alcohol, and two or more drink driving offences within five years.

Read the video transcript

Just here at Pine Rivers Magistrates Court today. I've attended court on a very very serious high range drink driving offence. Now, the blood alcohol reading was very high. It was .264. Uh it involved a single vehicle collision. Um and uh and thankfully my client was a sole occupant of the vehicle. So, no one else was involved in the incident. There was no injuries. But five times the legal limit, very high reading with a crash. These were two two of the obvious aggravating features involved in this incident that we had to contend with.

The other [unclear: 'eight levels' in the captions] of aggravation were that my client had two previous drink driving offences, albeit 11 years ago and about 30 years ago. So, um quite some uh quite dated offences there. Um in relation to the client, he is a 66-year-old ex well, professional truck was a professional truck driver about 12 months ago. Uh he went his life began to basically spiral out of control. He had a medical episode at work. He was given a permanent leave of absence. Uh and that left him with no income.

And then a couple of months later, his wife had a serious and horrific accident where she fell into a sinkhole on a property and shattered her leg. And this has left her wheelchair bound for almost 12 months. Unfortunately, due to these significant uh life-changing events, uh they were both unable to work. They were both financially stressed. Uh a lot of pressure involved in the home. And both of them commenced drinking heavily and regularly um alcohol which which just um made the uh living arrangements a bit of a toxic environment to live under.

On the night of the offence my client and his wife were arguing heavily. It started getting quite nasty and in order to try and remove himself from the situation, my client left the house, got into the car and started driving. And then 10-15 minutes down the road he he he had a single vehicle accident. Now, his motivation to leave the house at that very volatile point was probably right thing to do, but the way he went about it by getting into his car as it was agreed to the court was all wrong.

It was very dangerous and my client is very lucky that he didn't hit anyone or injure or kill anyone in the process of his actions. We were able to outline to the court exactly what's been going on for the past 12 months, how his life has spiraled out of control, but more importantly the steps he's taken to address his issues. He's now off the alcohol. He's been assessed and getting treatment from the psychologist and a doctor as well. He did the Traffic Offenders Program. We're able to get a letter from his workplace confirming the issue.

He's has put him off the road and out of work and also letters from his wife and an apology letter from himself. So, this was all confirmation of and support of what our submissions were to the court. We did tender comparative case law to assist the court in handing down a sentence. We were surprised to get quite a low disqualification period of 12 months from today. I think the court did take some sympathy on our client from the hardship that he has been going through for the last 12 months, but in saying that does need to send a message to the community that drink driving is and will not be tolerated.

So, he's given 12 months off the road. He will have to do the interlock program after that. Um no no fine was given to him, but he's got to do 10 months of probation. Um and that was today's outcome. Very happy and relieved client. He's been very stressed about this matter. Uh he's now off the alcohol. He's getting psych treatment. I think it's very unlikely we'll see him back before the courts.

General information only, based on Queensland law at the time of filming. Not legal advice — every case turns on its own facts. Past results don't guarantee future outcomes.