Penrith Mid Range PCA Case Study: 0.082, Forklift Driver Gets a Conditional Release Order Without Conviction (NSW)

Jurisdiction
New South Wales
Court
Penrith Local Court
Charges
Mid range PCA (0.082), detected after an illegal U-turn
Outcome
Conditional release order for 2 years without conviction; no disqualification, no interlock, no fine for the PCA. $250 fine for the illegal U-turn.
Filmed
March 2022

Summary

A forklift driver with a poor traffic history was caught at 0.082 after an illegal U-turn while driving his sister home from a family party. With evidence of family hardship, a Traffic Offenders Program, references and an apology, Penrith Local Court made a 2-year conditional release order without conviction.

Key takeaways

  • The reading was 0.082, just inside the mid range category.
  • He had been off the road for 6 weeks, spending $150 to $300 a week on taxis.
  • His traffic record was poor, including an old declaration for repeated disqualified driving.
  • He completed a Traffic Offenders Program and gave references and an apology.
  • Result: a 2-year CRO without conviction, no disqualification and no interlock.

Penrith mid range PCA case study: a mid range charge at Penrith

In this Penrith mid range PCA case study, Boorman Lawyers appeared at Penrith Local Court in far western Sydney on a mid range drink driving offence. The reading was 0.082, which Joshua Boorman describes as having just slipped inside the mid range category.

What happened

The client had been at his brother’s birthday party, where he drank about six full-strength beers over about four and a half hours. He tried to count his drinks and self-assessed his sobriety, and he waited about an hour after his last drink before getting into the car to take his sister home.

On the way, he got a bit lost and performed an illegal U-turn at an intersection. Police saw it, pulled him over down the street and breath tested him. The final reading was 0.082, and he was charged with a mid range drink driving offence in NSW.

The hardship of being off the road

The client works as a forklift driver and storeman and has to be at work at 5 am. He has a de facto partner and a six-year-old son. He had been off the road for the six weeks since the offence, spending about $30 a day on taxis and Ubers to get to work, and the same to get home: anywhere between $150 and $300 a week.

His partner works but usually finishes at about 1.30 pm and would normally pick up their son from school, which he had not been able to do. Josh says this caused significant financial hardship and was logistically difficult for the family.

A bold request

Josh describes the request to the court as bold. Boorman Lawyers asked the court not to record a conviction, not to disqualify him, and not to place him on the mandatory alcohol interlock program, but instead to put him on a conditional release order, which our lawyer describes as basically a good behaviour bond, for two years.

It was a big ask, especially for a mid range offence and given that his traffic record was not good. Over the previous 10 years or so he had a smattering of more minor traffic infringements, and about 10 or 11 years earlier he had been declared a habitual traffic [unclear] because of repeated disqualified driving offences, which Josh notes are serious. Over time he had grown up and his record had improved, but his past was still on his record.

What counted in his favour

Josh stressed the financial and logistical hardship that being off the road had caused the family, and says the fact that the reading had only just crept into the mid range category was his saving grace. The client had also completed a Traffic Offenders Program, had references from his partner and his mother-in-law, and wrote a strong letter of apology to the court showing genuine remorse.

The outcome

The court acceded to the request and dealt with the matter by way of a conditional release order without proceeding to conviction. He was effectively not convicted, can start driving straight away, is not on any interlock program, and received no fine for the drink driving offence. He did receive a $250 fine for the illegal U-turn.

Our lawyer describes the client as extremely happy and very lucky, and says he can now move forward and learn from the experience. Every case is different, and this outcome does not predict the result in any other matter.

Key general information (NSW)

General information only, not legal advice, as at October 2026. Every case turns on its own facts.

  • Drink driving (PCA) offences: In New South Wales most drink driving charges are “prescribed concentration of alcohol” (PCA) offences under the Road Transport Act 2013 (NSW).
  • The broad penalty picture: The “automatic” period is the period that applies unless the court makes a specific order, and the “minimum” period is the shortest period the court can set.
  • The Alcohol Interlock Program: A zero alcohol limit applies to all interlock drivers, and a person who receives an interlock order but does not enter the program is disqualified for 5 years.
  • Conditional release orders: The NSW Sentencing Council explains that a conditional release order (CRO) can be made with or without recording a conviction.
  • Intervention programs and deferred sentencing: Fines in NSW are expressed in penalty units, and the Sentencing Council notes that a penalty unit is currently $110.

Further reading and related videos

Boorman Lawyers has more on appearing at Penrith, avoiding a conviction for drink driving in NSW and the NSW alcohol interlock program. Its NSW DUI site covers drink driving matters across NSW.

On this site, see a Mt Druitt mid range case, a Katoomba mid range case dealt with by a CRO and a Bankstown first-time mid range case, or browse all NSW and court town videos.

For people who are preparing to plead guilty without a lawyer, DIY DUI’s guide to drink and drug driving charges at Penrith covers the local court and plea process. (DIY DUI is a self-help program for people preparing their own guilty plea. It is not legal representation and is not part of Boorman Lawyers.)

Frequently asked questions

What did the court order?

A conditional release order for two years without proceeding to conviction. He was not disqualified, was not placed on the interlock program and was not fined for the drink driving offence. He received a $250 fine for the illegal U-turn.

Why did Josh call the request bold?

Because it was a mid range offence and the client’s traffic record was not good, including an old declaration made because of repeated disqualified driving offences.

What helped the client?

The family hardship caused by being off the road, the reading being only just inside the mid range category, a completed Traffic Offenders Program, references from his partner and mother-in-law, and a letter of apology.

What are the penalties for a first mid range PCA offence in NSW?

As at October 2026, Transport for NSW lists a maximum court-imposed fine of $2,200 and up to 9 months’ imprisonment for a first mid range PCA offence. When an interlock order is made, it lists a disqualification of 3 to 6 months followed by 12 months with an interlock.

What is a conditional release order?

A conditional release order (CRO) is a NSW sentencing option under the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999. It can be made with or without a conviction, and the NSW Sentencing Council notes it can last up to 2 years. Whether one is appropriate is a matter for the court in each case.

What is a mandatory interlock order in NSW?

In general terms, it is an order made on conviction for certain drink driving offences, including mid range, high range and repeat offences. It combines a minimum licence disqualification with a later period (at least 12 months) of driving only a vehicle fitted with an alcohol interlock. Transport for NSW publishes the periods for each offence. This is general information only.

Read the video transcript

So we're here at uh Penrith Local Court today at far western Sydney uh just appeared on a middle range drink driving offence the blood alcohol reading is 0.082 so it's just slipped into inside the middle range category um basically the facts of the matter were that our client had been at his brother's birthday party uh he had consumed about six full strength beers over about a four and a half hour period he tried to count his drinks uh self-assessed his sobriety he waited about an hour off his last drink for

Getting into the car to take his uh his sister home uh on the way home he somewhat got a bit lost and he performed an illegal u-turn at an intersection police saw this they took up with him and pulled him over down the street uh subjected him to a breath test and the final blood alcohol reading was 0.082 so charged with middle range uh drink driving offence in New South Wales now um our client's a forklift driver

A storeman um he's got to get up be at work at 5am in the morning he's got a de facto partner and they've got a six-year-old boy so he's been spending money probably about 30 dollars a day to get to work with expensive taxis and Ubers um and then obviously to get home from work as well so anywhere between 150 to 300 a week he's been spending um on taxis since he's been off the road and he has been off the road for the past six weeks since the offence occurred

So yeah this has certainly hit him financially and they caused significant financial hardship on the family his partner does work but usually works in the afternoons he finishes work at about 1 30 and would usually go and pick their son up from school so he hasn't been able to do this and this has obviously been logistically difficult for the family over the past six weeks since he's been off the road today we were boldly asking for the court to not convict him not record a conviction uh not disqualify him not find him

Not place him on the mandatory alcohol interlock program we were asking the court to put him on a conditional release order which is basically a good behaviour bond for two years and this was a big ask especially given that it was a mid-range drink-driving offence and that his traffic record was not all that good over the past uh over the past 10 years or so he's had a spattering of uh more minor traffic infringements but about 10 11 years prior he was declared a [unclear: 'habitual traffic appendage' in the captions] due to repeated disqualified driving offences which are serious offences obviously over time he's grown up

Um his traffic record has improved but you know his past was there on his record it still wasn't good and it um it wasn't obviously supportive of his uh case today but I I just did want to stress the hardship um both financially and logistically that being off the road had on his family and the fact that the blood alcohol reading had just sneaked snuck into the middle range category was his saving grace so the magistrate saw that he also did a Traffic Offenders Program complete that course he had some references from his partner uh his mother-in-law

A good strong letter of apology from him to the court showing his genuine remorse over the matter so we were grateful and [unclear: 'equine' in the captions] was certainly very lucky today because the court did accede to our request to deal with this matter by way of a conditional release order without proceeding to conviction so he was effectively not convicted he can commence driving straight away he's not put on any um interlock program and no fine was forthcoming he did however receive a 250 fine for the illegal u-turn that he did perform

But overall an extremely happy and ecstatic client he can move forward and learn from his lessons uh signing out from Penrith courthouse today and thanks for tuning in.

General information only, based on New South Wales law at the time of filming. Not legal advice — every case turns on its own facts. Past results don't guarantee future outcomes.