Katoomba Drink Driving Case Study: Mid-Range PCA (0.087), Supervised CRO Without Conviction (NSW)

Jurisdiction
New South Wales
Court
Katoomba Local Court
Charges
Middle range PCA (0.087), the day after heavy drinking
Outcome
Guilty plea. Conditional release order without conviction: 12 months' good behaviour supervised by Corrective Services, focused on rehabilitation. No fine, no disqualification, no interlock.
Filmed
August 2025

Summary

Joshua Boorman explains a mid-range PCA (0.087) at Katoomba Local Court. After heavy drinking the night before, one beer at lunch pushed the client into the mid range. Because he had already re-engaged with his psychologist and sought assessment at St John of God, the court made a supervised conditional release order without conviction, with no fine and no disqualification.

Key takeaways

  • One beer at lunch on top of the previous night's heavy drinking produced a mid-range reading of 0.087.
  • The roadside reading of 0.122 dropped to 0.087 at the police station.
  • Re-engaging with a psychologist and seeking assessment at St John of God were the steps the magistrate focused on.
  • The court made a 12-month conditional release order without conviction, supervised by Corrective Services.
  • There was no fine, no disqualification and no interlock, but the order depends on continuing rehabilitation.

The charge

In this Katoomba drink driving case study, Joshua Boorman appeared at Katoomba Local Court in the Blue Mountains on a middle range PCA charge. The blood alcohol reading was 0.087.

Our client had a very good traffic record over the previous 14 years, with only four minor traffic infringements. About five years earlier he had a drug possession matter, for which he received a conditional release order without conviction.

What happened

He had drunk a huge amount of alcohol the night before. The next day he was travelling from Sydney to Lithgow, stopped for a meat pie and had one beer with lunch. Twenty minutes later he was pulled over at a random breath testing site.

He blew 0.122 at the roadside — probably because of residual alcohol in his mouth from the beer 20 minutes earlier — but by the time he was tested at the police station the reading had dropped to 0.087.

He did not think one beer would put him over the limit. What he failed to recognise was the lingering effect of the large amount he had drunk the night before. The one beer at lunch topped him up into the mid range.

Who he is

Our client is 30, single, with no children. He is an artist who does bronze sculpture, works for wildlife charities, is renovating a house at Lithgow, and spends half his time living with his parents in Balmain. He has a history of mental health issues, including depression, and has been diagnosed with ADHD, for which he is medicated.

What the magistrate wanted to hear

The key issue for the magistrate was what our client had done, of his own volition, to address his drinking:

  • he re-engaged with his psychologist for alcohol counselling; and
  • more importantly, he contacted the St John of God rehabilitation centre and was being assessed for alcohol rehabilitation there.

That showed he was self-aware about the need to deal with his drinking. As Joshua explains, he does not drink every day, but when he does, he binge drinks — and this offence showed how the previous night’s drinking, plus one drink at lunch, pushed him into the mid range.

The outcome

The court wanted to give him a break, but also wanted to be sure he stayed committed to rehabilitation. The magistrate made a conditional release order without proceeding to conviction:

  • no conviction;
  • no fine;
  • no disqualification — he can get back on the road;
  • no interlock program; and
  • a 12-month good behaviour bond, supervised by Corrective Services, with a particular focus on making sure he continues his rehabilitation with St John of God.

As long as he completes that process and does what is required, the bond will simply end after 12 months and he will not have a conviction.

What this Katoomba drink driving case study shows

A conditional release order can come with strings attached. Here the court’s leniency was tied to the steps the client had already taken before court, and to him continuing them under supervision. Getting help early, on your own initiative, can make a real difference to how a magistrate sees a matter. Every case is different.

Key general information (NSW)

General information only, not legal advice, as at October 2026. Every case turns on its own facts.

  • Drink driving (PCA) offences: In New South Wales most drink driving charges are “prescribed concentration of alcohol” (PCA) offences under the Road Transport Act 2013 (NSW).
  • The broad penalty picture: As one example, Transport for NSW lists the maximum court-imposed penalty for a first mid range PCA offence as a fine of $2,200 and up to 9 months’ imprisonment (as at October 2026).
  • The Alcohol Interlock Program: For a first mid range PCA offence, Transport for NSW lists a disqualification of 3 to 6 months, followed by an interlock period of 12 months.
  • Sentencing options: At the lower end, a court can find an offence proved but not record a conviction, either by dismissing the charge or by making a conditional release order (CRO) without conviction.

Further reading and related videos

Boorman Lawyers has more on appearing at Katoomba Local Court, no-conviction outcomes for drink driving in NSW and the NSW Traffic Offender Program. Its NSW site covers drink driving matters across NSW.

On this site, see a Downing Centre case that ended without a conviction and a Parramatta mid-range case after a crash, or browse all NSW and drink driving videos.

For people who are preparing to plead guilty without a lawyer, DIY DUI’s guide to drink and drug driving charges at Katoomba covers the local court and plea process. (DIY DUI is a self-help program for people preparing their own guilty plea. It is not legal representation and is not part of Boorman Lawyers.)

Frequently asked questions

What outcome did the client receive at Katoomba Local Court?

A conditional release order without conviction for 12 months, supervised by Corrective Services. There was no fine, no disqualification and no interlock program.

How did one beer lead to a mid-range reading?

The client had drunk a large amount the night before. Alcohol was still in his system the next day, and one beer at lunch topped him up to 0.087.

Why was his roadside reading higher than the final reading?

He blew 0.122 at the roadside, probably because of residual alcohol in his mouth from the beer 20 minutes earlier. By the time he was tested at the police station the reading was 0.087.

What conditions come with the conditional release order?

He must be of good behaviour for 12 months under Corrective Services supervision, with a focus on continuing his rehabilitation at St John of God. If he completes that, he will not have a conviction.

What is a conditional release order?

A conditional release order (CRO) is a NSW sentencing option under the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999. It can be made with or without a conviction, and the NSW Sentencing Council notes it can last up to 2 years. Whether one is appropriate is a matter for the court in each case.

What is a mandatory interlock order in NSW?

In general terms, it is an order made on conviction for certain drink driving offences, including mid range, high range and repeat offences. It combines a minimum licence disqualification with a later period (at least 12 months) of driving only a vehicle fitted with an alcohol interlock. Transport for NSW publishes the periods for each offence. This is general information only.

Read the video transcript

Good day. Josh here at Katoomba in the Blue Mountains. I've appeared at Katoomba local court this morning. Uh had a couple of matters. One was dealt with um by way of an adjournment because uh we had one of the charges withdrawn. But the main matter I want to talk to you about today is a middle range PCA offence for our client. Now the blood alcohol reading was 0.087. Um, our client has a very good traffic record over the last uh, 14 years. He's only got four more minor traffic infringements.

He did have a drug possession matter um, just about 5 years ago, which he received a conditional release order for with no conviction. Um the facts of this matter were um interesting in the sense that he'd had a huge uh amount of alcohol the night before. Uh the next day he got up. He has was travelling from Sydney to Lithgow and uh he pulled in for a meat pie and he grabbed a beer over lunch. 20 minutes later he's pulled over for a random breath test set up.

Uh he blew over the limit. He actually blew over at 0.122 a higher amount of alcohol. Um probably due to the uh residual alcohol still in his mouth from the drink that he had consumed 20 minutes earlier. But by the time he got back to the police station, it had significantly dropped to 0.087. Now, um the fact is that my client didn't think one beer would put him over the limit, but he's failed to recognise the lingering effects of the alcohol and the large amount of alcohol that he had consumed the night before.

So, this one beer over lunch has really topped him up. Uh to his credit though, uh he's he's quite an interesting young man. He's sort of a trade artist, does u bronze sculpturing. He works for wildlife um charities. Um he's renovating a house out at Lithgow. He spends half of his time living in Balmain with his parents. He's 30 years of age. He's he's single. He's got no children. Um he has got a history of mental health issues, uh including depression. He's been diagnosed with ADHD, so he's medicated for those sorts of things.

But the big thing that the magistrate was interested in hearing about today was the fact that on his own volition, his own doing, he has um re-engaged with his psychologist um to get some alcohol counselling. But more importantly, he has touch base with the St John of God rehabilitation centre and is being assessed for um rehabilitation um for alcohol consumption through that particular facility. Um what this does show is that my client's been self-aware of his own need to address his alcohol um uh consumption. He doesn't drink every day, but when he does drink, he binge drinks.

And as you can see from this offence, the night before he had consumed a huge amount of alcohol still present in his system the next day and with one drink over lunch, it shot his um blood alcohol reading up to a mid-range category. So, um, on one hand, the court today wanted to give our client a bit of a break, but they were also keen on, um, being assured that he remains committed to his um, uh, rehabilitation. So, they gave him a conditional release order without proceeding to conviction.

This means he can get back on the road. He's not fined. He's not convicted. He does have to be on a good behaviour bond for 12 months and this is to be supervised from uh corrective services now with particular interest in um supervising him to ensure that he continues through the rehabilitation process with the St John of God rehabilitation facility. And as long as he goes through that process, which he's doing anyway on his own back um and completes that process and does um what's asked and required of him, um then the good behaviour bond will just disappear in 12 months time.

He remains conviction free. He's back on the road. Um no interlock program, no fine. Um so a very good outcome uh for our client today. But it does come with the uh the strings attached that he does have to continue to uh help himself and um and work on uh himself from a personal point of view and pro proceed with the um rehabilitation steps and processes that he has already put in place prior to coming to court today. It's a very very good and measured outcome from uh the court here at Katoomba.

Um it's very cold, it's very foggy, it's rainy a bit. Um, but it's it's what life is like up the mountain, especially in August. Uh, so thanks for tuning in and see you in the next episode.

General information only, based on New South Wales law at the time of filming. Not legal advice — every case turns on its own facts. Past results don't guarantee future outcomes.