Dubbo Drink Driving Case Study: Low Range (0.079), Third Offence, 2 Months Off the Road and a 12-Month Interlock (NSW)

Jurisdiction
New South Wales
Court
Dubbo Local Court
Charges
Low range PCA (0.079), third drink driving offence
Outcome
Guilty plea. 2-month disqualification, 12-month alcohol interlock program, $500 fine.
Filmed
April 2023

Summary

A man who had overcome a methamphetamine addiction and been released from jail in December 2021 was caught at 0.079 a year later, his third drink driving offence. Dubbo Local Court reduced his disqualification to 2 months, with a 12-month interlock and a $500 fine.

Key takeaways

  • Joshua explains that a first low range offence can usually be dealt with by a penalty notice, but repeat offenders must go to court.
  • This was the client's third drink driving offence, the last in 2019.
  • He had a history of drug addiction and jail, but had stayed clean since his release in December 2021.
  • He was caught speeding at 76 km/h and blew 0.079, just under the mid range.
  • He received a 2-month disqualification, a 12-month interlock and a $500 fine.

Why a low range charge went to court

In this Dubbo drink driving case study, Joshua Boorman appeared at Dubbo Local Court on a low range drink driving offence. He explains that a low range offence usually would not need to go to court in New South Wales, because it can be dealt with by a penalty notice. He describes that as an on-the-spot fine (which he puts at $568) and a three-month automatic suspension, with no conviction.

This matter was different because it was the client’s third drink driving offence, the last being in 2019. That made him a repeat offender, and Joshua explains that repeat offenders must go to court even for a low range offence.

A complicated history

Joshua describes the client as a troubled teenager following some personal abuse issues. He became addicted to methamphetamine for a number of years in his late teens and early 20s and committed a raft of drug-related offences, going in and out of jail on three occasions.

He was last released on 20 December 2021. Since then he had stayed clean from drugs and had not committed any other offences, until this one in December 2022.

What happened

Earlier that night he had four or five schooners of beer over about three hours with friends at a local tavern. He caught a taxi home. His partner, who had been urging him to come home, had gone to a friend’s place, and when he learned there were a number of men there, he became jealous and concerned and made the very poor decision to drive over.

On the way he was caught speeding at 76 km/h (the captions are unclear about the speed limit). Police breath tested him, and the reading was 0.079. Joshua says that was lucky: any higher and it would have been mid range, with a much longer time off the road, a longer interlock period and the potential for a jail sentence.

Submissions in this Dubbo drink driving case study

Joshua took the magistrate through the client’s background, explaining how he had stayed off drugs since leaving jail and that this was a single mistake. He stressed that the offence was not a trigger for him to start reoffending as he had in the past. The client was now completely abstinent from alcohol, focused on full-time work, and looking to settle down and have a family with his partner. Joshua describes his family and employment as the stabilising factors in his life.

The outcome

The magistrate showed some leniency. The client received:

  • a 2-month disqualification;
  • the alcohol interlock program for 12 months; and
  • a $500 fine.

Joshua says the client was very happy and can now move past this setback.

What this case shows

For a repeat low range offence, the matter goes to court and an interlock order follows. A person’s history matters, but so does what they have done since. Here, more than a year of staying clean and stable work helped the court see the offence as a setback rather than a return to old patterns. Every case is different.

Key general information (NSW)

General information only, not legal advice, as at October 2026. Every case turns on its own facts.

  • Low range drink driving penalties: First offence: a maximum court-imposed fine of $2,200, a minimum disqualification of 3 months, an automatic disqualification of 6 months, and no alcohol interlock order.
  • When a low range charge goes to court: For a second or subsequent low, novice or special range offence, Transport for NSW’s Alcohol Interlock Program page lists a disqualification of 1 to 3 months followed by an interlock period of 12 months when an interlock order is made (as at October 2026).
  • How repeat offences are treated: Transport for NSW says drivers convicted of 2 drink driving offences within a 5-year period must pass the Driver Knowledge Test before they can be licensed again.
  • Intervention programs and deferred sentencing: Fines in NSW are expressed in penalty units, and the Sentencing Council notes that a penalty unit is currently $110.
  • The court process: Drink and drug driving charges in NSW are usually dealt with in the Local Court.

Further reading and related videos

Boorman Lawyers has more on appearing at Dubbo Local Court, NSW drink driving penalties and NSW alcohol interlock laws. Its NSW DUI site covers drink driving matters across regional NSW.

On this site, see a Finley third-offence low range case and a Boggabilla third-offence mid range case, or browse all NSW and drink driving videos.

For people who are preparing to plead guilty without a lawyer, DIY DUI’s guide to drink and drug driving charges at Dubbo covers the local court and plea process. (DIY DUI is a self-help program for people preparing their own guilty plea. It is not legal representation and is not part of Boorman Lawyers.)

Frequently asked questions

What penalty did the client receive?

A 2-month disqualification, 12 months on the alcohol interlock program and a $500 fine.

Why did a low range charge go to court?

Joshua explains that, as a third drink driving offence, the client was a repeat offender, and repeat offenders must go to court even for a low range offence.

Why was the 0.079 reading significant?

It was just under the mid range. Joshua says a higher reading would have meant more time off the road, a longer interlock period and the potential for a jail sentence.

What is the interlock period for a repeat low range offence in NSW?

For a second or subsequent low, novice or special range offence, Transport for NSW lists a disqualification of 1 to 3 months followed by 12 months with an interlock when an interlock order is made (as at October 2026).

What are the PCA ranges in NSW?

As at October 2026, Transport for NSW lists novice range (learner or provisional driver above zero), special range (special category drivers over 0.02), low range (0.05 to 0.079), mid range (0.08 to 0.149) and high range (0.15 and above).

Read the video transcript

Yeah it's Josh Boorman here from Boorman Lawyers just outside the Dubbo Local Court I've appeared here today uh on a low range drink driving offence so usually a low range drink driving offence wouldn't necessarily have to come to court in New South Wales they can be dealt with by way of a penalty notice and on on the spot fine of um a little over 500, $568 and a three-month automatic suspension with no conviction but the difference that this matter was is that this was my client's third drink driving offence uh his last being in 2019

So he did categorise him as a repeat offender and repeat offenders even if they're low range category are required to come to court so the history for our client was a little bit complicated um he was a troubled teenager on the back of some personal abuse issues which occurred he ended up getting addicted to methamphetamine for a number of years in his late teens and early 20s and then he ended up committing a raft of typically drug addicted related offences which saw him go in

Out of jail on three different occasions he was last released on the December the 20 December 2021 he's remained clean from drugs and alcohol well mostly drugs which were the problem and he has not committed any other offences since he was last released from jail until now obviously in December 2022 he was pulled over for for a low range drink Drive earlier that night he'd gone to the South Dubbo Tavern he'd had a drink well he'd had four or five Schooners of beer over a three hour period with some friends his partner was peppering him to get home when he did get home she he caught a taxi home she'd gone gone over to a friend's place

My client was aware that the friend's place that she'd went to there was a number of sort of males there he became jealous and concerned and made the very poor decision get in the car and drive over there as he was going over there he was caught speeding 76 in a [unclear: 'six design' in the captions] zone so that's the manner of um driving which brought him to the attention of police. They obviously breath tested him and luckily for him the reading fell just into the low range category 0.079

So any higher and it would have been in the mid-range category and he would have been facing a lot longer time off the road a lot longer interlock period and a potential for a jail sentence but today we're able to go into the background with the magistrate explain how he had basically stayed off drugs and made this one mistake since being released from jail it's obviously a setback for him he's disappointed himself his family and his employer disappointed in him

But I really had to stress before the court that it was not a trigger for him to commence reoffending as he has previously done so in the past he still clean from drugs he's now completely abstinent from alcohol he's focused on full-time work his partner looking to settle down have a family so um there was a uh it was a bit of a different one because of his complicated history uh and it being a third drink driving offence uh the magistrate did seek to uh offer some leniency by reducing it down to two months disqualification

But he does have to do a 12-month interlock program and he was given a $500 fine uh very happy clients today he knows where he's going now he can focus on himself personal development and the things that matter most to him in his life the stabilising factors are his family and his employment and he can move forward past this speed bump and um become a worthy member of our community and thanks for tuning in here out at Dubbo Local Court today.

General information only, based on New South Wales law at the time of filming. Not legal advice — every case turns on its own facts. Past results don't guarantee future outcomes.