Albury Drink Driving Case Study: High Range PCA (0.157), Interlock Exemption and the 12-Month Minimum (NSW)

Jurisdiction
New South Wales
Court
Albury Local Court
Charges
High range PCA (0.157), first offence
Outcome
Guilty plea. Interlock exemption order granted; 12-month minimum disqualification, backdated.
Filmed
June 2024

Summary

A Victorian concrete truck driver visiting family near Albury was stopped after a U-turn at 2.30 am and recorded 0.157. Because he could not obtain a NSW interlock licence, the court granted an interlock exemption and imposed the 12-month minimum disqualification, backdated.

Key takeaways

  • The reading was 0.157, in the high range, for a first offence.
  • The client lives in Victoria and held a Victorian licence.
  • Joshua explains he could not obtain a NSW interlock licence, and failing to complete an interlock order would have meant at least five years off the road.
  • The court granted an interlock exemption with the 12-month minimum, backdated.
  • At the end of the period he can be relicensed without doing the NSW interlock program.

A high range charge for an interstate driver

In this Albury drink driving case study, Joshua Boorman appeared at Albury Local Court on a high range drink driving charge. The final reading was 0.157. (The first mention of the figure is unclear in the captions.)

Our client is originally from India and has lived in Australia since 2014. He lives in Melbourne and holds a Victorian driver licence.

What happened

In late January, he came up to the Albury region to meet his cousin. They went to dinner and had some drinks, and he then drove to stay at his cousin’s place.

At about 2.30 am, police saw him do a U-turn that Joshua says probably was not all that kosher. He was not charged over the U-turn, but it gave police a reason to stop him and breath test him. The final reading was 0.157.

About our client

  • He works as a concrete truck driver, and since being off the road he has been unable to work, causing significant financial problems.
  • He had a very good traffic record: one speeding offence in Victoria in 2019.
  • He completed the Traffic Offenders Program, wrote a letter of apology and provided good character references.

Apart from the U-turn, nothing was significantly aggravating. It was very late at night with no pedestrians or other cars around, he was alone in the car, and he was not speeding or driving erratically. Joshua submitted that, for a first offence, the objective seriousness was relatively low despite the reading being in the high range.

The interlock problem

There was a fair bit of discussion between Joshua and the bench about the interlock. The offence happened in New South Wales and was before a New South Wales court, but our client lives in Victoria and held a Victorian licence.

Joshua explains the technical issue: if a mandatory interlock order were made, our client would be unable to get the New South Wales interlock licence needed to complete it, and failing to complete the interlock period would mean being off the road for a mandatory minimum of five years. That would be an extreme level of hardship. Joshua also notes Victoria may have its own view about the offence when he next deals with his Victorian licence.

The outcome

  • the magistrate granted an interlock exemption; and
  • imposed the 12-month minimum disqualification, backdated.

Joshua explains that the exemption doubled the minimum disqualification period, but at the end of it our client is free to be relicensed and does not have to complete the New South Wales interlock program. He describes this as a much cleaner approach.

What this Albury drink driving case study shows

Cross-border cases can raise practical problems that the standard orders do not easily solve. Here, the court weighed the hardship of an interlock order that could not realistically be completed. Every case is different, and outcomes depend on the facts and the person’s history.

Key general information (NSW)

General information only, not legal advice, as at October 2026. Every case turns on its own facts.

  • Drink driving (PCA) offences: In New South Wales most drink driving charges are “prescribed concentration of alcohol” (PCA) offences under the Road Transport Act 2013 (NSW).
  • The broad penalty picture: As one example, Transport for NSW lists the maximum court-imposed penalty for a first high range PCA offence as a fine of $3,300 and up to 18 months’ imprisonment (as at October 2026).
  • The Alcohol Interlock Program: A zero alcohol limit applies to all interlock drivers, and a person who receives an interlock order but does not enter the program is disqualified for 5 years.
  • Interlock exemption orders: For a mandatory interlock offence, the court must make either an interlock order or an interlock exemption order.

Further reading and related videos

Boorman Lawyers has more on appearing at Albury Local Court, NSW alcohol interlock laws and the NSW high range drink driving guideline judgment. Its NSW site covers drink driving matters across regional NSW.

On this site, see the Manly high range case with a 2-year interlock and a Boggabilla repeat mid range matter, or browse all NSW and drink driving videos.

For people who are preparing to plead guilty without a lawyer, DIY DUI’s guide to drink and drug driving charges at Albury covers the local court and plea process. (DIY DUI is a self-help program for people preparing their own guilty plea. It is not legal representation and is not part of Boorman Lawyers.)

Frequently asked questions

What penalty did the client receive?

The magistrate granted an interlock exemption and imposed the 12-month minimum disqualification, backdated.

Why was the interlock a problem for this client?

He lives in Victoria and holds a Victorian licence. Joshua explains that he would have been unable to get the NSW interlock licence needed to complete an interlock order, and not completing it would have meant a minimum of five years off the road.

What happens when an interlock exemption order is made in NSW?

Transport for NSW explains that the licence is cancelled, the person is disqualified, and they must complete the Sober Driver Program at their own expense during the disqualification. For a first high range offence, it lists the disqualification with an exemption as 3 years automatic, with a minimum of 12 months (as at October 2026).

On what grounds does Transport for NSW say an exemption can be given?

Transport for NSW says the court may give an exemption if the person proves they do not have access to a vehicle to install the device, or they have a medical condition that stops them using it. An exemption cannot be based on living in a regional or remote area.

What are the maximum penalties for a first high range offence in NSW?

As at October 2026, Transport for NSW lists a maximum court-imposed fine of $3,300 and up to 18 months’ imprisonment for a first high range PCA offence.

Read the video transcript

He it's Josh here from Boorman Lawyers I'm just outside Albury Local Local Court where I've appeared on a high range drink driving offence the blood alcohol reading was [unclear: '.57' in the captions; later stated as 0.157] nothing significantly aggravated about this matter our client um originally from India he's been here for the past 10 years since 2014 um he resides in Melbourne uh but on the night of the offence in late January he did come up to uh or region to meet up with his cousin

Went to dinner with his cousin had some drinks went to uh drive and stay at his cousin's place in [unclear] and um and uh and yeah on the way there he was seen doing a U-turn which probably wasn't um all that kosher he wasn't charged with uh performing in illegal U-turn but that gave um him a reason for the police to pull him over and breath test him very l at night 2:30 a.m. in the morning

It was a positive reading and a final BAC of 0.157 nothing significantly aggravated about the matter I mean aside from the U-turn it was very late at night and other pedestrians or cars around it was a sole occupant of the vehicle it wasn't speeding driving erratically nothing's un like that he had a very good traffic record uh one speeding offence in 2019 in Victoria um so and and he went and did the Traffic Offenders program he works as a concrete truck driver

So any since being off the road he has been unable to work uh which has caused him significant financial um problems very remorseful uh put before the court a letter of apology got some good character references um but yeah uh first offence and um relatively low level of objective seriousness despite the reading falling into the high range category um there was a fair bit of discussion between myself and the bench today about the interlock uh this is a matter that has occurred in New South Wales New South Wales offence we're at a New South Wales Court a client resides in Victoria

At the time was on a [unclear] Victorian driver's licence so um the the kind of technical issue that popped up was whether an exemption for the interlock should be granted um now Victoria might have their own ideas about um if my client goes back and tries to get a Victorian driver's licence about um penalising him again in their state for this offence um but for the sake of um being penalized in New South Wales if he was given an inter the mandatory interlock order which he was unable to do because he resides in new southwales [sic: Victoria]

Was unable to get a new southwales licence interlock licence and if he failed to do that interlock period Then he would be put off the road for a mandatory minimum of 5 years so that would have been an extreme level of hardship for the sake of any sort of um complication like that the magistrate today uh granted an exemption of the interlock and um uh that did increase the period of disqualification it doubled it for the minimum period of 12 months which was backdated

But at the end of that period um my client is uh free to go and be relicensed again and um doesn't have to do the interlock um program in new southw so it's a lot cleaner approach we got today um he's very relieved and happy to now move on with his life and um and I think being a first offence one prior speeding entry in 10 years extremely unlikely we'll see him back before the court again but thanks for tuning in here at Albury Local Court in the very very southern part of New South Wales.

General information only, based on New South Wales law at the time of filming. Not legal advice — every case turns on its own facts. Past results don't guarantee future outcomes.