Blacktown Mid Range Drink Driving Case Study: 0.089, Birthday Drinks End in an 18-Month CRO and No Conviction (NSW)

Jurisdiction
New South Wales
Court
Blacktown Local Court
Charges
Mid range PCA (0.089), first offence
Outcome
Guilty plea. Conditional release order for 18 months without conviction. No fine and no interlock order.
Filmed
May 2023

Summary

On his birthday, a civil engineering draftsman who also drove for Uber was caught at 0.089 at a random breath test. With an employer reference, Uber income records and the Traffic Offenders Program, Blacktown Local Court made an 18-month CRO without conviction.

Key takeaways

  • The reading was 0.089, at the bottom of the mid range, with nothing aggravating about the offence.
  • It was his first offence, with only one minor speeding entry on his record.
  • He had borrowed about $18,000 to help his family in India and drove for Uber as a second job.
  • The court made an 18-month CRO without conviction, with no fine and no interlock order.
  • Joshua stresses there are no guarantees, but preparation is within a person's control.

A first offence at the bottom of the mid range

In this Blacktown mid range drink driving case study, Joshua Boorman appeared at Blacktown Local Court on a mid range drink driving charge with a reading of 0.089. Joshua explains that the mid range in New South Wales runs from 0.080 to 0.15, so this reading had only just crept into the mid range category.

He describes it as a relatively stock standard drink driving offence with nothing aggravating about it.

A birthday surprise

It was the client’s birthday. After work, friends invited him over for a surprise: other friends had come up unexpectedly from Melbourne to celebrate with him. Between about 7 pm and 9.30 pm he had two to three glasses of full-strength beer.

He had arranged a video call with his family back home in India, who had organised a birthday cake to be delivered to his place so they could celebrate together. He self-assessed his sobriety, felt fine, and made the foolish decision to drive home.

Stopped at a random breath test

He was pulled over at a stationary random breath testing site. He was not speeding or driving erratically, and there was no collision. A final reading of 0.089 was recorded and he was charged with mid range drink driving.

It was his first offence. He had no criminal record and only one minor speeding offence, carrying one demerit point, from about 12 months earlier.

Why his licence mattered

He works Monday to Friday as a civil engineering draftsman, and his employer provided a strong letter of support. Over the previous couple of years he had borrowed about $18,000 to support his family in India and help fix up their home, so he had taken on a second job driving for Uber at night and on weekends.

Receipts showed his Uber income, which stopped when his licence was suspended at the time of the offence. Joshua says this left him in a dire financial situation and made getting back on the road incredibly important. He also completed the Traffic Offenders Program.

The outcome

Joshua pushed for a non-conviction order. The court made a conditional release order for 18 months without conviction. There was no fine and no alcohol interlock order, and he can resume driving.

Joshua stresses that there are no guarantees of a non-conviction order and that the decision is in the hands of the court. What is in a person’s control, he says, is the preparation: the steps taken since the offence, the letters of support, the traffic program and any other material that supports a persuasive case.

What this Blacktown mid range drink driving case study shows

A low mid range reading, a good record and nothing aggravating about the offence can open the door to a no-conviction outcome, but the supporting material still matters. Here, evidence of the real financial impact of losing his licence was part of the case. Every case is different, and outcomes depend on the facts.

Key general information (NSW)

General information only, not legal advice, as at October 2026. Every case turns on its own facts.

  • Drink driving (PCA) offences: In New South Wales most drink driving charges are “prescribed concentration of alcohol” (PCA) offences under the Road Transport Act 2013 (NSW).
  • The broad penalty picture: As one example, Transport for NSW lists the maximum court-imposed penalty for a first mid range PCA offence as a fine of $2,200 and up to 9 months’ imprisonment (as at October 2026).
  • The Alcohol Interlock Program: A zero alcohol limit applies to all interlock drivers, and a person who receives an interlock order but does not enter the program is disqualified for 5 years.
  • Conditional release orders: The NSW Sentencing Council explains that a conditional release order (CRO) can be made with or without recording a conviction.
  • The court process: Drink and drug driving charges in NSW are usually dealt with in the Local Court.

Further reading and related videos

Boorman Lawyers has more on appearing at Blacktown Local Court, no-conviction outcomes for drink driving in NSW and the NSW Traffic Offenders Program. Its Sydney site covers drink driving matters across Sydney courts.

On this site, see a Mt Druitt mid range PCA case and a Gosford mid range case that ended with a CRO, or browse all NSW and drink driving videos.

For people who are preparing to plead guilty without a lawyer, DIY DUI’s guide to drink and drug driving charges at Blacktown covers the local court and plea process. (DIY DUI is a self-help program for people preparing their own guilty plea. It is not legal representation and is not part of Boorman Lawyers.)

Frequently asked questions

What was the outcome at Blacktown?

A conditional release order for 18 months without conviction, with no fine and no interlock order. He was able to resume driving.

Why was his licence so important?

He worked full-time as a civil engineering draftsman and also drove for Uber at night and on weekends to repay about $18,000 in loans. His Uber income stopped when his licence was suspended.

Is a no-conviction outcome guaranteed with good preparation?

No. Joshua says there are no guarantees and the decision is in the hands of the court. Preparation, references and the traffic program are what a person can control.

What is a conditional release order?

A conditional release order (CRO) is a NSW sentencing option under the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999. It can be made with or without a conviction, and the NSW Sentencing Council notes it can last up to 2 years. Whether one is appropriate is a matter for the court in each case.

What are the penalties for a first mid range PCA offence in NSW?

As at October 2026, Transport for NSW lists a maximum court-imposed fine of $2,200 and up to 9 months’ imprisonment for a first mid range PCA offence. When an interlock order is made, it lists a disqualification of 3 to 6 months followed by 12 months with an interlock.

Read the video transcript

Hey, it's Josh Boorman here from Boorman Lawyers. I'm just outside Blacktown Local Court here on a mid-range drink driving uh offence today where the blood alcohol reading was 0.089. So, it's just crept into the mid-range category there given the uh mid-range category in New South Wales is between 0.080 through to 0.15. So, it's at the bottom end. Um this matter before the court today was a relatively stock standard type of drink driving offence. Um there was nothing aggravated about the matter. Um my client it was the day of his birthday.

He'd finished work. Some friends had invited him over to their place uh for a surprise. And the surprise was that uh some of his friends from Melbourne uh had unexpectedly come up and and and wanted to celebrate with his birthday. Um he obliged and he went over and he ended up consuming two to three glasses of full strength beer um between about 7:00 p.m. at night through to uh 9:30 p.m. He had some prior obligations of getting home that night because um he had prearranged a video call with his family back home in India because they'd uh organised a birthday cake to be sent to his place and he was going to go back, jump on the video call, cut the cake, and celebrate with his family over the video call.

So, he did make that foolish decision of getting into the car to drive home. He self-assessed his sobriety. He was of the view that he felt fine, unaffected by the um two to three glasses of beer that he consumed earlier. So, he jumped into the car and drove home. Now, he was pulled over for the purpose of a random breath test or a stationary random breath test set up site. Um and uh so, it wasn't his manner of driving. he wasn't speeding, driving erratically. Uh there was certainly no collision, uh nothing sinister or of that nature.

Um he was pulled over, it was a positive reading, and um a final BAC reading of 0.089 was recorded. So, he was charged with middle-range drink driving. It was the first offence for him. He has a very He has no prior criminal record. He has very good traffic record with only one more minor speeding offence uh on his record, which attracted a one demerit point, and that was about 12 months ago. So, a very good record, absolutely nothing aggravated about the matter. The reading was towards the lower end of the middle-range category.

Um and he did all the right things since the offence occurred. He did the Traffic Offenders Program. He disclosed the matter to um He works two jobs. He um One job is as a civil engineer draftsman uh for a company, and he works Monday to Friday 9:00 to 5:00 in that job. He disclosed the matter to his employer and got a good strong letter of support from his employer. He has found himself over the last um couple of years in a bit of financial difficulty. He ended up borrowing about $18,000 worth of loans to support his family back home in India and help them uh fix up their home.

So, um uh he has been taking on a second job as an Uber driver at nighttime and on weekends. And we were able to obviously show the court um receipts from those Uber uh payments over the last few months, and obviously it stopped um when this offence occurred because when the offence occurred, his licence was suspended at the time. So, that has significantly reduced his um income and his ability to pay back those loans, it has left him in quite a um a dire financial situation.

Um so, getting back on the road was uh incredibly important to him. Today, um we pushed for a non-conviction order under section [unclear: '91B' in the captions], but that came with a uh good behaviour bond. He's got to be good behaviour for 18 months. Cannot break the law during that period of time. He um uh it means he's not convicted. He can resume his driving abilities. He's not subject to an alcohol interlock order. And there was no fine forthcoming. So, a very very outcome good outcome today. Uh very positive.

It was certainly what my client was hoping for. Um as I uh have told him all along, there's certainly no guarantees um in in getting a non-conviction order. Um Ultimately, the decision is in the hands of the court. But what is in our control is the um steps he can take since the incident occurred, the preparation, the letters of support, the traffic program, any other material that we are able to rely upon to push forward a persuasive case for the court to um uh give our client maximum level level of leniency.

So, certainly the facts and his good traffic record were were big. Um uh uh points that actually worked in his favour in relation to this matter. Um but all the supplementary subjective material that we presented were also persuasive in allowing the court to use its discretion not to record a conviction on this occasion. So, he's a a very very relieved client. I He's a very good man. He's a person of good character. Supports his family. Works hard. And I don't think um we'll ever see him back before the court making such a a foolish mistake ever again in the future.

So, thanks for tuning in. Uh it's Boorman Lawyers here at Blacktown Local Court in Western Sydney.

General information only, based on New South Wales law at the time of filming. Not legal advice — every case turns on its own facts. Past results don't guarantee future outcomes.