The charge
In this Picton drink driving case study, Joshua Boorman represented a client at Picton Local Court on a mid-range drink driving (PCA) charge with a reading of 0.102. The matter was aggravated because it was his second offence within five years: in 2021 he had been before Hornsby court for exactly the same offence. As Joshua says, some lessons clearly had not been learned.
What happened
Our client had been working on a site in Leppington and finished around 4:30 pm. He was going through a separation and had been arguing with his wife throughout the day. He has pre-existing depression, anxiety and childhood trauma, and in recent years, when things became too hard, he had used alcohol to cope.
After work he bought seven cans of Jack Daniel’s from a bottle shop, drove back to the industrial area near his work site, and drank them in quick succession between about 5 pm and 8:30 pm. Around 9 pm he fell asleep in the car and slept for about four and a half hours.
He woke at about 1 to 1:30 am, felt a lot better and decided to drive home to Gregory Hills. About eight minutes down the road he was stopped for a random breath test and recorded 0.102.
Nothing else aggravating
- It was the very early hours of the morning with no other traffic around.
- He was the sole occupant and had driven only a short distance.
- He was stopped at an RBT, not because of his manner of driving.
- He cooperated with police, entered an early guilty plea and showed genuine remorse, including through a letter of apology.
The impact, and the steps he took
He is 35, now separated, with two young boys aged 6 and 11. He is self-employed installing garages and gates, and needs to drive to run his business. Since going off the road in early March 2025 he had to employ someone to drive him around, cutting into his take-home pay — the alternative was closing the business and being unemployed.
He completed the Traffic Offender Program. More importantly, he:
- saw his doctor and was referred to a psychologist;
- has been treated for depression, anxiety, childhood trauma and alcohol dependency;
- started attending Alcoholics Anonymous; and
- is taking antidepressants and medication to help him stay off alcohol.
In short, he had done everything he could to address his underlying mental health and alcohol dependency issues.
The outcome
His record did not help, and the offence was treated as a second offence. We sought a reduction in the disqualification period. His Honour noted that he had done everything he could to address his issues and imposed:
- the minimum disqualification of six months for a second mid-range PCA, with time already off the road taken into account — leaving about three and a half months before he can apply for an interlock licence;
- a $1,200 fine; and
- a 24-month interlock period.
Because it was a second offence, there was a real risk of a community corrections order or community service. We persuaded the magistrate not to go down that route, and to keep the penalties to the minimum disqualification, a fine and the interlock.
What this Picton drink driving case study shows
A second offence within five years raises the stakes, including the risk of a community-based order. Genuine treatment for the issues behind the drinking — a psychologist, AA and medication — gave the court good reason to keep the penalty at the minimum. Every case is different and turns on its own facts.
Key general information (NSW)
General information only, not legal advice, as at October 2026. Every case turns on its own facts.
- Drink driving (PCA) offences: In New South Wales most drink driving charges are “prescribed concentration of alcohol” (PCA) offences under the Road Transport Act 2013 (NSW).
- The broad penalty picture: As one example, Transport for NSW lists the maximum court-imposed penalty for a second or subsequent mid range PCA offence as a fine of $3,300 and up to 12 months’ imprisonment (as at October 2026).
- The Alcohol Interlock Program: According to Transport for NSW’s Alcohol Interlock Program page, drivers convicted of mid range, high range, repeat and other serious drink driving offences are required to take part.
- Sentencing options: At the lower end, a court can find an offence proved but not record a conviction, either by dismissing the charge or by making a conditional release order (CRO) without conviction.
Further reading and related videos
Boorman Lawyers has more on appearing at Picton Local Court, NSW alcohol interlock laws and NSW drink driving penalties. Its Sydney site covers drink driving matters across Sydney and surrounding courts.
On this site, see a Boggabilla third-offence mid-range case and a Parramatta mid-range case after a crash, or browse all NSW and drink driving videos.
For people who are preparing to plead guilty without a lawyer, DIY DUI’s Picton page covers the local court and plea process. (DIY DUI is a self-help program for people preparing their own guilty plea. It is not legal representation and is not part of Boorman Lawyers.)