Picton Drink Driving Case Study: Second Mid-Range PCA (0.102), 6-Month Minimum and No Community Order (NSW)

Jurisdiction
New South Wales
Court
Picton Local Court
Charges
Middle range PCA (0.102) — second offence within five years
Outcome
Guilty plea. 6-month minimum disqualification (time already off the road counted); $1,200 fine; 24-month interlock. No community corrections order or community service.
Filmed
August 2025

Summary

Joshua Boorman explains a second mid-range PCA (0.102) within five years at Picton Local Court. The client drove home after sleeping in his car following a day of conflict and drinking. After treatment with a psychologist, AA and medication, the court imposed the 6-month minimum, a $1,200 fine and a 24-month interlock, and no community corrections order.

Key takeaways

  • A prior mid-range PCA at Hornsby in 2021 made this a second offence within five years.
  • Sleeping in the car for about four and a half hours did not bring his reading under the limit; he recorded 0.102.
  • Treatment for depression, anxiety, trauma and alcohol dependency, plus AA and medication, was central to the submissions.
  • The court imposed the 6-month minimum disqualification (with time already served counted), a $1,200 fine and a 24-month interlock.
  • A community corrections order or community service was a real risk on a second offence, but was avoided.

The charge

In this Picton drink driving case study, Joshua Boorman represented a client at Picton Local Court on a mid-range drink driving (PCA) charge with a reading of 0.102. The matter was aggravated because it was his second offence within five years: in 2021 he had been before Hornsby court for exactly the same offence. As Joshua says, some lessons clearly had not been learned.

What happened

Our client had been working on a site in Leppington and finished around 4:30 pm. He was going through a separation and had been arguing with his wife throughout the day. He has pre-existing depression, anxiety and childhood trauma, and in recent years, when things became too hard, he had used alcohol to cope.

After work he bought seven cans of Jack Daniel’s from a bottle shop, drove back to the industrial area near his work site, and drank them in quick succession between about 5 pm and 8:30 pm. Around 9 pm he fell asleep in the car and slept for about four and a half hours.

He woke at about 1 to 1:30 am, felt a lot better and decided to drive home to Gregory Hills. About eight minutes down the road he was stopped for a random breath test and recorded 0.102.

Nothing else aggravating

  • It was the very early hours of the morning with no other traffic around.
  • He was the sole occupant and had driven only a short distance.
  • He was stopped at an RBT, not because of his manner of driving.
  • He cooperated with police, entered an early guilty plea and showed genuine remorse, including through a letter of apology.

The impact, and the steps he took

He is 35, now separated, with two young boys aged 6 and 11. He is self-employed installing garages and gates, and needs to drive to run his business. Since going off the road in early March 2025 he had to employ someone to drive him around, cutting into his take-home pay — the alternative was closing the business and being unemployed.

He completed the Traffic Offender Program. More importantly, he:

  • saw his doctor and was referred to a psychologist;
  • has been treated for depression, anxiety, childhood trauma and alcohol dependency;
  • started attending Alcoholics Anonymous; and
  • is taking antidepressants and medication to help him stay off alcohol.

In short, he had done everything he could to address his underlying mental health and alcohol dependency issues.

The outcome

His record did not help, and the offence was treated as a second offence. We sought a reduction in the disqualification period. His Honour noted that he had done everything he could to address his issues and imposed:

  • the minimum disqualification of six months for a second mid-range PCA, with time already off the road taken into account — leaving about three and a half months before he can apply for an interlock licence;
  • a $1,200 fine; and
  • a 24-month interlock period.

Because it was a second offence, there was a real risk of a community corrections order or community service. We persuaded the magistrate not to go down that route, and to keep the penalties to the minimum disqualification, a fine and the interlock.

What this Picton drink driving case study shows

A second offence within five years raises the stakes, including the risk of a community-based order. Genuine treatment for the issues behind the drinking — a psychologist, AA and medication — gave the court good reason to keep the penalty at the minimum. Every case is different and turns on its own facts.

Key general information (NSW)

General information only, not legal advice, as at October 2026. Every case turns on its own facts.

  • Drink driving (PCA) offences: In New South Wales most drink driving charges are “prescribed concentration of alcohol” (PCA) offences under the Road Transport Act 2013 (NSW).
  • The broad penalty picture: As one example, Transport for NSW lists the maximum court-imposed penalty for a second or subsequent mid range PCA offence as a fine of $3,300 and up to 12 months’ imprisonment (as at October 2026).
  • The Alcohol Interlock Program: According to Transport for NSW’s Alcohol Interlock Program page, drivers convicted of mid range, high range, repeat and other serious drink driving offences are required to take part.
  • Sentencing options: At the lower end, a court can find an offence proved but not record a conviction, either by dismissing the charge or by making a conditional release order (CRO) without conviction.

Further reading and related videos

Boorman Lawyers has more on appearing at Picton Local Court, NSW alcohol interlock laws and NSW drink driving penalties. Its Sydney site covers drink driving matters across Sydney and surrounding courts.

On this site, see a Boggabilla third-offence mid-range case and a Parramatta mid-range case after a crash, or browse all NSW and drink driving videos.

For people who are preparing to plead guilty without a lawyer, DIY DUI’s Picton page covers the local court and plea process. (DIY DUI is a self-help program for people preparing their own guilty plea. It is not legal representation and is not part of Boorman Lawyers.)

Frequently asked questions

What penalty did the court impose for this second mid-range PCA?

The minimum disqualification of six months (with time already off the road taken into account), a $1,200 fine and a 24-month interlock period. No community corrections order or community service was imposed.

Why was this treated as a second offence?

The client had a mid-range drink driving offence at Hornsby in 2021, about four years earlier, so this was a second offence within five years.

Does sleeping in your car before driving guarantee you are under the limit?

No. In this case the client slept for about four and a half hours after drinking, felt better, drove about eight minutes and still recorded 0.102.

What steps did the client take before court?

He completed the Traffic Offender Program, saw his doctor and a psychologist, was treated for mental health issues and alcohol dependency, started Alcoholics Anonymous and began medication, and wrote a letter of apology.

What is a mandatory interlock order in NSW?

In general terms, it is an order made on conviction for certain drink driving offences, including mid range, high range and repeat offences. It combines a minimum licence disqualification with a later period (at least 12 months) of driving only a vehicle fitted with an alcohol interlock. Transport for NSW publishes the periods for each offence. This is general information only.

What happens after two drink driving offences in five years in NSW?

Transport for NSW says drivers convicted of two drink driving offences within five years must pass the Driver Knowledge Test before they can be licensed again. Police can also apply vehicle sanctions to some repeat, high-risk offenders.

Read the video transcript

Good day, it's Josh from Boorman Lawyers. I'm just here out here at Picton um courthouse behind me across the road there is uh Picton local court. I'm just across the road enjoying a nice cup of coffee. Um so today I've come out to Picton cuz I've had a mid-range drink driving uh offence that I have represented my client for. Um the matter was slightly aggravated due to the fact that this was his second offence within a 5-year period. He was actually before the court at Hornsby in 2021 um 4 years ago for exactly the same offence, a mid-range drink driving offence.

So clearly some lessons have not been learned from my client um and he's back before the uh the court system um on the same alcohol-related traffic offence. So in relation to this offence uh the blood alcohol reading was 0.102. Um facts of the the facts of the matter occurred when um my client um had been working uh on a work site in Leppington. Um he finished around 4:30 p.m. He'd been going through quite an emotional period. He was going through a separation with his wife. He'd been arguing with his wife throughout the day.

Um he does have pre-existing issues of depression, anxiety, uh childhood trauma. So there were some mental health challenges there. And unfortunately over recent years when times have gotten too hard for him from a mental health point of view, he has used alcohol as a coping mechanism. So on this day, he finished work around 4:30. He made a decision to go down to the um bottle shop, pick up seven cans of Jack Daniel's, drove his car back to the industrial area in Leppington near where he'd worked, and he uh drank those seven cans of alcohol in quite a quick succession in about 2 and 1/2 hours.

So, from about Sorry, 3 and 1/2 hours. So, from about 5:00 p.m. till 8:30 p.m. He drank those. Around 9:00 p.m. he fell asleep in the car. He slept in his car for about 4 and 1/2 hours. He woke up around 1:00 a.m. and well, about 1:00 1:30 and felt a lot better and decided to drive home to where he lives in Gregory Hills. He only made it about 8 minutes down the road. He's pulled over for a random breath test by police and recorded that final blood alcohol concentration reading of 0.102.

Nothing aggravated about the offence in itself. It was very early hours of the morning. There's no other traffic around. He was the sole occupant of the vehicle. He'd driven a short distance. It was an RBT. It wasn't his manner of driving which brought him to the attention of police. He cooperated with police and he has entered an early plea of guilty. He's shown genuine remorse through that early plea of guilty and through his letter of apology to the court. Now, client's 35 years of age. He's now separated from his wife.

He's got two young boys age 6 and 11. Um He He's self-employed. He installs garages and gates and he um obviously needs to drive in order to operate his business. Since being off the road in early March 2025, he he has had to go and employ a person in his business simply to get him get him around and drive for him. Um that's obviously affected his take-home salary at the end of the week. Um but it's it was either that or completely wrap up the business which would leave him unemployed.

So, it was a big step that he had to take. Um he um he went into the Traffic Offenders Program. Um so, he learned a lot about that. Um but, to his credit, the big critical steps that he did take was he went along to his doctor, got a referral to a psychologist. Um he has been treated for mental health issues, depression, anxiety, childhood trauma, um and alcohol dependency. He's also started Alcoholics Anonymous. So, he's also on antidepressants and medication now, and medication to um help with his abstinence from alcohol.

So, really he's done all he can do to address his underlying um um mental health and alcohol dependency issues. [Inaudible exchange.] Um obviously, his traffic record doesn't assist. He's got that prior one 4 years ago. Um uh but, naturally, it was categorised as a second offence. Um today we were seeking uh some reduction of the disqualification period. Um His Honour noted that he had done everything he could to address his issues, and gave him the minimum period of disqualification of 6 months for a second offence of mid-range PCA.

Uh he gave him a $1,200 fine, and um and he does have to commit to doing uh 24-month interlock until he gets his licence back. The period of disqualification already served was taken into account off the um 6-month period. So, he's got about 3 and 1/2 months left to serve um before he can apply for the interlock licence. Um being a second offence, there was certainly a risk that he could have been um uh put on a community corrections order, or issued some hours of community service, but we were able to persuade the magistrate not to go down that route and leave the penalties simply as disqualification, fine [unclear].

And we're even able to get those penalties heavily reduced down to the minimum period. So thanks for tuning in here today. It's quite cool out at Picton. It's a lovely little country town on the outskirts of Sydney and we do appear out here all the time. Thanks for tuning in.

General information only, based on New South Wales law at the time of filming. Not legal advice — every case turns on its own facts. Past results don't guarantee future outcomes.