Manly Mid Range Drink Driving Case Study: 0.130, 22-Year-Old After a Break-Up Gets the 3-Month Minimum (NSW)

Jurisdiction
New South Wales
Court
Manly Local Court
Charges
Mid range PCA (0.130), first offence
Outcome
Guilty plea. 3-month minimum disqualification, 12-month interlock, $850 fine.
Filmed
April 2022

Summary

A 22-year-old who spent the night with friends after a break-up drove home at about 5 am and blew 0.130 at a random breath test. With the Traffic Offenders Program and good references, Manly Local Court imposed the 3-month minimum, a 12-month interlock and an $850 fine.

Key takeaways

  • The reading was 0.130 at about 5 am, a first offence.
  • He had five large glasses of wine with friends after a relationship breakdown.
  • There were no aggravating features: an RBT, no passengers and no traffic.
  • He cares full-time for his grandmother and had been off the road for two and a half months.
  • He received the 3-month minimum, a 12-month interlock and an $850 fine.

A young driver at Manly

In this Manly mid range drink driving case study, Boorman Lawyers appeared at Manly Local Court on a middle range drink driving offence with a reading of 0.130. The client was 22. He was pulled over at about 5 am on 20 December 2021.

What happened

In the days before the offence, the client had gone through a very emotional and upsetting relationship breakdown. His friends invited him over that night to support him. He arrived late, was given a glass of wine straight away, and spent a fairly uneventful night sitting around talking and drinking wine.

The hours went by, and suddenly it was 4 am. He told Joshua Boorman he had five large glasses of wine, which Josh notes must have been larger than standard drinks to produce a reading of 0.130. He lived only about 10 minutes away, and at about 4 or 5 in the morning he made the terrible decision to drive home.

No aggravating features

He was pulled over for a random breath test. Josh says there was nothing aggravating about the matter: it was the early hours of the morning, with no pedestrians or traffic around, no passengers and only a short distance to drive. He was cooperative with police and showed genuine remorse. Our lawyer describes it as a very poor mistake made at a time when he was emotionally vulnerable.

Preparing for court in this Manly mid range drink driving case study

The client completed the Traffic Offenders Program, which the magistrate received well. Josh says that if he had not done it, the magistrate would have adjourned the matter so he could, as happened with other matters that day.

He also provided good references. He cares full-time for his grandmother and was about to go for his real estate licence. These were the reasons he needed to get back on the road as soon as possible. He had already been off the road for two and a half months.

The outcome

Josh asked for the minimum disqualification of 3 months, which was almost complete. The magistrate agreed. The client received:

  • the 3-month minimum disqualification;
  • the 12-month interlock program to follow; and
  • an $850 fine.

Our lawyer believes the client will learn significant life lessons from the experience and thinks it very unlikely he will be back before the courts.

What this case shows

A mid range reading brings a mandatory interlock order in NSW, but the length of the disqualification can still depend on the circumstances. Here the time already spent off the road, the completed program and his caring responsibilities all helped. Every case is different, and outcomes depend on the facts.

Key general information (NSW)

General information only, not legal advice, as at October 2026. Every case turns on its own facts.

  • Drink driving (PCA) offences: In New South Wales most drink driving charges are “prescribed concentration of alcohol” (PCA) offences under the Road Transport Act 2013 (NSW).
  • The broad penalty picture: As one example, Transport for NSW lists the maximum court-imposed penalty for a first mid range PCA offence as a fine of $2,200 and up to 9 months’ imprisonment (as at October 2026).
  • The Alcohol Interlock Program: A zero alcohol limit applies to all interlock drivers, and a person who receives an interlock order but does not enter the program is disqualified for 5 years.
  • Intervention programs and deferred sentencing: Fines in NSW are expressed in penalty units, and the Sentencing Council notes that a penalty unit is currently $110.
  • The court process: Drink and drug driving charges in NSW are usually dealt with in the Local Court.

Further reading and related videos

Boorman Lawyers has more on appearing at Manly Local Court, NSW drink driving penalties and the NSW Traffic Offenders Program. Its Sydney site covers drink driving matters across Sydney courts.

On this site, see a Bankstown mid range case at the same reading and a Manly high range case, or browse all NSW and drink driving videos.

For people who are preparing to plead guilty without a lawyer, DIY DUI’s guide to drink and drug driving charges at Manly covers the local court and plea process. (DIY DUI is a self-help program for people preparing their own guilty plea. It is not legal representation and is not part of Boorman Lawyers.)

Frequently asked questions

What penalty did the client receive?

The 3-month minimum disqualification, a 12-month interlock period to follow, and an $850 fine.

How important was the Traffic Offenders Program?

Josh says the magistrate received it well, and that without it the magistrate would have adjourned the matter so he could complete it, as happened with other matters that day.

Did the time already off the road count?

He had been off the road for two and a half months, so the 3-month minimum was almost complete by the time of court.

What are the penalties for a first mid range PCA offence in NSW?

As at October 2026, Transport for NSW lists a maximum court-imposed fine of $2,200 and up to 9 months’ imprisonment for a first mid range PCA offence. When an interlock order is made, it lists a disqualification of 3 to 6 months followed by 12 months with an interlock.

What is a mandatory interlock order in NSW?

In general terms, it is an order made on conviction for certain drink driving offences, including mid range, high range and repeat offences. It combines a minimum licence disqualification with a later period (at least 12 months) of driving only a vehicle fitted with an alcohol interlock. Transport for NSW publishes the periods for each offence. This is general information only.

Read the video transcript

Just outside Manly Local Court today and I've appeared on a middle-range drink driving offence. His blood alcohol reading was 0.130. The offender was quite young, 22 years of age. He was pulled over about 5:00 a.m. late last year, 20 December 2021. In the days prior to the incident, he'd gone through a very emotional, upsetting relationship breakdown. He uh His friends invited him over on the night of the offence to uh to support him and uh he arrived at their place late. He was immediately given a glass of wine and um and he he had a relatively uneventful night at his friend's place just sitting around talking um and having some drinks of glasses of wine.

Um the hours went past. Uh all of a sudden it was 4:00 a.m. in the morning. He instructs he had five large glasses of wine. These were obviously larger than a standard glass of alcohol to deliver a reading of 0.130. Uh he lived only about 10 minutes away and it was about 4:00 5:00 in the morning. Uh he took his chance, unfortunately, made a terrible decision to decide to get into the car to drive the short distance home. He was pulled over for the purpose of a random breath test, nothing aggravated about the matter.

Uh it was uh early hours of the morning, no other pedestrians or traffic around. Um he was cooperative with police, showed genuine remorse, had a short distance to drive, uh no passengers in the car. Um very, very unfortunate incident for a young fellow. He's made a a very poor mistake at a time when he was quite emotionally vulnerable. We uh got our client to go to Traffic Offenders Program, which was well received by the magistrate. In fact, if he hadn't have done the Traffic Offenders Program, the magistrate would have sent him away and adjourned the matter for that purpose as was the case with other prior matters today.

Um he got some good references. He's um uh caring full-time for his grandmother um and he's about to go for his real estate licence. So these were all issues of why he needed to get back on the road as soon as possible. He's already been off the road for 2 and 1/2 months since the incident occurred. So we were pushing for the minimum disqualification of 3 months um which is almost complete. He will then have to do the 12-month interlock program and um and he was also fined $850.

So um our requests on penalty were um uh agreed to by the magistrate and um I think it's likely our client will learn significant life lessons from this incident and uh very unlikely he'll be back before the uh criminal justice system again in the future. Thanks for tuning in today out of Manly in Sydney.

General information only, based on New South Wales law at the time of filming. Not legal advice — every case turns on its own facts. Past results don't guarantee future outcomes.